Confield: Difference between revisions

From aepages
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(positional arguments can be implicit)
(some rewriting)
Line 13: Line 13:


== History ==
== History ==
The material shown on ''Confield'' was developed and curated over 18 months. <ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20020816104848/http://www.autechre.nu/cgi-bin/newspro/news.cgi?newsid1018136565,21609,#:~:text=it%20spans%20about%2018%20months..%20it%27s%20a%20selection. https://web.archive.org/web/20020816104848/http://www.autechre.nu/cgi-bin/newspro/news.cgi?newsid1018136565,21609,#:~:text=it%20spans%20about%2018%20months..%20it%27s%20a%20selection.]</ref>  
The material shown on ''Confield'' was developed over 18 months. <ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20020816104848/http://www.autechre.nu/cgi-bin/newspro/news.cgi?newsid1018136565,21609,#:~:text=it%20spans%20about%2018%20months..%20it%27s%20a%20selection. https://web.archive.org/web/20020816104848/http://www.autechre.nu/cgi-bin/newspro/news.cgi?newsid1018136565,21609,#:~:text=it%20spans%20about%2018%20months..%20it%27s%20a%20selection.]</ref>  


In the [[Sound On Sound Interview, April 2004]], Autechre gave some background information on Confield, specifically noting the increased use of Max first in live sets<!-- confield tour? --> and then in studio experiments "that weren't really applicable in a club environment" lead to a lot of what became ''Confield.''<ref name=":0">[[Sound On Sound Interview, April 2004]]</ref>
In the [[Sound On Sound Interview, April 2004]], Autechre gave some context to the development of ''Confield'', specifically noting the increased use of Max first in live sets<!-- confield tour? --> and then in studio experiments "that weren't really applicable in a club environment" lead to what would become ''Confield.''<ref name=":0">[[Sound On Sound Interview, April 2004]]</ref>


However, Autechre has pushed back on the narrative that ''Confield'' was a purely 'generative' Max record (and by proxy 'random').<ref>{{Cite AAA doc|1541}}</ref> In the same [[Sound On Sound Interview, April 2004|Sound On Sound interview]], Sean expressed discomfort with how generative being synonymous with random when they're "based on a set of rules" that they controlled, alongside utilising a lot of "analogue sequencers and drum machines" which enabled a ton of complex sequencing.<ref name=":0" />
However, Autechre has pushed back on the narrative that ''Confield'' was a purely 'generative' Max record.<ref>{{Cite AAA doc|1541}}</ref> In the same [[Sound On Sound Interview, April 2004|Sound On Sound interview]], Sean expressed discomfort with how generative was taken to mean random when the material was based on heavily controlled set of rules and "analogue sequencers and drum machines" for complex sequencing.<ref name=":0" />


Rob noted that roughly 10% of ''Confield'' was properly generative,<ref>{{Cite AAA doc|1194}}</ref> and in an [[Interview with SB for Reverb Magazine, January 2008]], Sean further clarified that only 3 tracks on ''Confield'' even used Max sequencing.<ref>[[Interview with SB for Reverb Magazine, January 2008]]</ref> <!-- i know Uviol and bits of Sim Gishel were using it, but idk what the last one was. Cfern possibly? -->Much of ''Confield'' was instead done by hand with Logic Pro.<ref>https://www.reddit.com/r/autechre/comments/9of3dv/autechres_tsugi_interview_translated/</ref>
Rob noted that roughly 10% of ''Confield'' was properly generative,<ref>{{Cite AAA doc|1194}}</ref> and in an [[Interview with SB for Reverb Magazine, January 2008]], Sean further clarified that only 3 tracks on ''Confield'' even used Max for sequencing.<ref>[[Interview with SB for Reverb Magazine, January 2008]]</ref> <!-- i know Uviol and bits of Sim Gishel were using it, but idk what the last one was. Cfern possibly? -->''Confield'' was mostly done by hand with Logic Pro.<ref>https://www.reddit.com/r/autechre/comments/9of3dv/autechres_tsugi_interview_translated/</ref>


The record has gained a status for being one of their most difficult records,<!-- citation for this possibly? --> however Sean felt that "it's like pop music compared to some of the stuff we had considered putting out!"<ref name=":0" /> and that the record didn't feel like a huge leap, but rather like just "another album" similar to ''[[Chiastic Slide]]''.<ref>{{Cite AAA doc|795}}</ref>
The record has gained a status for being one of their most difficult records,<!-- citation for this possibly? --> however Sean felt that "it's like pop music compared to some of the stuff we had considered putting out!"<ref name=":0" /> and that the record was "another album" similar to ''[[Chiastic Slide]]'' rather than a huge leap forward.<ref>{{Cite AAA doc|795}}</ref>


=== Cover ===
=== Cover ===
There are two main versions of the cover for Confield. The first (shown in the thumbnail of article) is for the CD issues.<ref name=":1" /> The vinyl issues uses a different image for the cover from the original Confield cover. <ref>https://www.discogs.com/release/8434-Autechre-Confield</ref>  
There are two versions of the cover for ''Confield:'' the CD issues<ref name=":1" /> - seen in the thumbnail of the article - and the vinyl issues.<ref>https://www.discogs.com/release/8434-Autechre-Confield</ref>  


For the promotion cycle of ''Confield'', a page was posted by Warp <!-- on (3rd April? 4th March? i hate dates) 2001 -->titled Confileid (Con File ID). <!-- this needs a huge second pass from a proper historian. the short's description links to rubber johnny but i remember that one was incorrect, and it was a different page. remind me to find that again. It had a weird chiastic slide aesthetic in the archived version which i assume the page itself would've featured the confileid video. -->[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-NsvXJ5DyAk On the page, it featured an animation of dozens of 3D planes being scattered with a moving camera.] Multiple frames of the animation went on to be used in the design of ''Confield,'' including both of the main covers.  
For the promotion cycle of ''Confield'', a page was posted by Warp <!-- on (3rd April? 4th March? i hate dates) 2001 -->titled Confileid (Con File ID). <!-- this needs a huge second pass from a proper historian. the short's description links to rubber johnny but i remember that one was incorrect, and it was a different page. remind me to find that again. It had a weird chiastic slide aesthetic in the archived version which i assume the page itself would've featured the confileid video. -->[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-NsvXJ5DyAk On the page, it featured an animation of dozens of 3D planes being scattered with a moving camera.] Multiple frames of the animation went on to be used in the design of ''Confield,'' including for both of the main covers.  


When ''Confield'' and ''[[Draft 7.30]]'' was reissued in 2023, Warp put out a promotional video for ''Confield'' featuring the same animation but in higher quality. They also put out a series of shorts of album tracks played over animations; both of the original for [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LgZQGpK3o-8 Sim Gishel] and [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Zci4NpOQlA Lentic Catachresis], as well as different versions including a fountain-like eruption for [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sSgvFBESo_A VI Scose Poise], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o1Mu3VcN8tE Cfern], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pyJmCTBjJZ8 Pen Expers]; a side downpour for [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rtstpM8WJ-A Bine] and [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kCOVyc-Jw3M Eidetic Casein]; and a top-down view for [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MAipXaToYQs Parhelic Triangle] and [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GC5k4dDyhjU Uviol]. <!-- they also reuploaded all the unique ones here https://www.instagram.com/p/CpX0DtStuN9/?img_index=1 -->
When ''Confield'' and ''[[Draft 7.30]]'' was reissued in 2023, Warp put out a promotional video for ''Confield'' featuring the same animation but in higher quality. They also put out a series of shorts of album tracks played over animations; both of the original for [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LgZQGpK3o-8 Sim Gishel] and [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Zci4NpOQlA Lentic Catachresis], as well as different versions including a fountain-like eruption for [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sSgvFBESo_A VI Scose Poise], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o1Mu3VcN8tE Cfern], [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pyJmCTBjJZ8 Pen Expers]; a side downpour for [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rtstpM8WJ-A Bine] and [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kCOVyc-Jw3M Eidetic Casein]; and a top-down view for [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MAipXaToYQs Parhelic Triangle] and [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GC5k4dDyhjU Uviol]. <!-- they also reuploaded all the unique ones here https://www.instagram.com/p/CpX0DtStuN9/?img_index=1 -->
Line 61: Line 61:
=== Uviol ===
=== Uviol ===


* [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p_B_dT8MrxU A 16-minute version of "Uviol"] was played during the 2008-02-23 Webcast. In the [[WATMM Ask Autechre Anything, November 2013|WATMM Ask Autechre Anything]], Sean mentioned that the longer versions are often parts of the real-time jams without as much editing. <ref>https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1XAizLmKun4yF6oBVUhIrewYN-ZiY_9ORckmT-hF93Ho/edit#gid=0&range=D289</ref>
* [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p_B_dT8MrxU A 16-minute version of "Uviol"] was played during the 2008-02-23 Webcast. In the [[WATMM Ask Autechre Anything, November 2013|WATMM Ask Autechre Anything]], Sean mentioned that the longer versions are often parts of the real-time jams without as much editing. <ref>[https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1XAizLmKun4yF6oBVUhIrewYN-ZiY_9ORckmT-hF93Ho/edit#gid=0&range=D289]{{Cite AAA doc|289}}</ref>
* "Uviol" was one of the tracks to use a lot of Max sequencing. <ref name=":2" />
* "Uviol" was one of the tracks to use a lot of Max sequencing. <ref name=":2" />



Revision as of 19:34, 1 March 2024

Confield

Confield.jpg

Artist Autechre
Released 30 April 2001
Label Warp Records (WARP128)
Peel Session 2
(2000)
Confield Gantz Graf
(2002)

Confield is the sixth studio album by Autechre released on Warp Records. It was originally released on April 30th, 2001, then later repressed on vinyl in 2023, alongside Draft 7.30.

History

The material shown on Confield was developed over 18 months. [1]

In the Sound On Sound Interview, April 2004, Autechre gave some context to the development of Confield, specifically noting the increased use of Max first in live sets and then in studio experiments "that weren't really applicable in a club environment" lead to what would become Confield.[2]

However, Autechre has pushed back on the narrative that Confield was a purely 'generative' Max record.[3] In the same Sound On Sound interview, Sean expressed discomfort with how generative was taken to mean random when the material was based on heavily controlled set of rules and "analogue sequencers and drum machines" for complex sequencing.[2]

Rob noted that roughly 10% of Confield was properly generative,[4] and in an Interview with SB for Reverb Magazine, January 2008, Sean further clarified that only 3 tracks on Confield even used Max for sequencing.[5] Confield was mostly done by hand with Logic Pro.[6]

The record has gained a status for being one of their most difficult records, however Sean felt that "it's like pop music compared to some of the stuff we had considered putting out!"[2] and that the record was "another album" similar to Chiastic Slide rather than a huge leap forward.[7]

Cover

There are two versions of the cover for Confield: the CD issues[8] - seen in the thumbnail of the article - and the vinyl issues.[9]

For the promotion cycle of Confield, a page was posted by Warp titled Confileid (Con File ID). On the page, it featured an animation of dozens of 3D planes being scattered with a moving camera. Multiple frames of the animation went on to be used in the design of Confield, including for both of the main covers.

When Confield and Draft 7.30 was reissued in 2023, Warp put out a promotional video for Confield featuring the same animation but in higher quality. They also put out a series of shorts of album tracks played over animations; both of the original for Sim Gishel and Lentic Catachresis, as well as different versions including a fountain-like eruption for VI Scose Poise, Cfern, Pen Expers; a side downpour for Bine and Eidetic Casein; and a top-down view for Parhelic Triangle and Uviol.

A high quality frame from the animation was also used as a Twitch image for au7echre.

Tracks

VI Scose Poise

  • The same reyong instrument used on "Parhelic Triangle" was also used on "VI Scose Poise" [10]
  • On an old promotional website the track used to be called "VI Code Spoilse"

Cfern

Pen Expers

Sim Gishel

  • "Sim Gishel" only used some algorithmic elements.[12]

Parhelic Triangle

  • Rob noted that "Parhelic Triangle" didn't rely on any generative/algorithmic elements at all.[12]
  • In the July Twitch AMA, Sean explained that the process behind "Parhelic Triangle". He first recorded himself playing a reyong (a type of gamelan instrument) which was then taken into Logic. The "couple of MIDI parts laid over the top" of the track were detuned to 9 EDO to be in key with the reyong. The loose pulse of the track is due to the reyong being played somewhat irregularly by Sean and him having to manually time it up in Logic before overlaying the percussion to it. The percussion was assembled from "rubber bands in a shoebox sampled on an Emu E-synth". [13]

Bine

Eidetic Casein

Uviol

Lentic Catachresis

MCR Quarter

  • The title is likely a play on Envane's "Quarter" naming aesthetic, and MCR likely is just short for Manchester.
  • As listed on the Japanese CD issue, "MCR Quarter" was recorded in 1998 at Manchester's Band On The Wall, however it reappeared (possibly just replayed the bootleg recording) at Warp's 10th Anniversary event on November, 5 1999.

Tracklist

# Title Length
1 VI Scose Poise 6:57
2 Cfern 6:41
3 Pen Expers 7:08
4 Sim Gishel 7:15
5 Parhelic Triangle 6:04
6 Bine 4:41
7 Eidetic Casein 6:12
8 Uviol 8:35
9 Lentic Catachresis 8:30
1:02:03
10 MCR Quarter (Recorded Live At Band On The Wall, Manchester 1998) [Japanese CD exclusive] 11:03
Total 1:13:06

Trivia

  • The CAT number, WARP128, was likely specifically requested by Autechre. 128 is the seventh power of 2.
  • Confield was originally titled "L.E.D." on a promotional CDr, distributed by Source 360°

Links

Credits

References